Model: Claude Haiku 4.5 (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
supervisorOn = PersonalAssistant + trajectory supervisor on the stall edge
What third-party package does module a.py ultimately import?
What third-party package does module a.py ultimately import?
{"action":"GATHER_EVIDENCE","rationale":"The only blocker is a single factual question — the terminal third-party import of a.py — and one tool has failed persistently 3 times. Rather than repeating the same failing call, resolve the fact with a bounded read-only lookup that follows the import chain via alternative tools.","strategy_hint":null,"plan_note":null,"investigation":{"question":"Starting from a.py, what is the full local import chain and which external (non-stdlib, non-local) package does it ultimately resolve to?","suggested_tools":["bash: cat a.py and each subsequently imported local module","bash: grep -rn \"^import \\|^from \" on the directory to map the import graph","bash: python -c \"import ast\" style static parse, or pip list to distinguish third-party vs stdlib"]},"question":null}No natural-language reply — the run ended on a harness directive or an unrecovered stall. See the full harness trace below.
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "requests" | fail |
| not contains "none" | pass |
| not contains "no third-party" | pass |
| not contains "only local modules" | pass |
| not contains "a.py has no external" | pass |
success no · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered no
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| hypothesis | — | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| supervisor | acted | GATHER_EVIDENCE: The only blocker is a single factual question — the terminal third-party import of a.py — and one tool has failed persistently 3 times. Rather than repeating the same failing call, re |
action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → output_validation (2)