Model: Claude Haiku 4.5 (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
What third-party package does module a.py ultimately import?
flagOn PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposer vs supervisorOn PersonalAssistant + trajectory supervisor on the stall edgeflagOn — controlsupervisorOn — candidateno natural-language reply — ended on a harness directive / unrecovered stall
no natural-language reply — ended on a harness directive / unrecovered stall
no tool calls
no tool calls
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "requests" | fail |
| not contains "none" | pass |
| not contains "no third-party" | pass |
| not contains "only local modules" | pass |
| not contains "a.py has no external" | pass |
success no · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered no
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "requests" | fail |
| not contains "none" | pass |
| not contains "no third-party" | pass |
| not contains "only local modules" | pass |
| not contains "a.py has no external" | pass |
success no · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered no
| latency | 3762 ms |
| cost | $0.0033 |
| tokens | 193 |
| supervisor consults | 0 |
| latency | 13253 ms |
| cost | $0.0161 |
| tokens | 847 |
| supervisor consults | 1 |
Other seeds — seed 2: fail · $0.0035 · 4.3 s seed 3: fail · $0.0036 · 5.6 s
Other seeds — seed 2: fail · $0.0185 · 18.0 s seed 3: fail · $0.0126 · 15.7 s
What third-party package does module a.py ultimately import?
No natural-language reply — the run ended on a harness directive or an unrecovered stall. See the full harness trace below.
What third-party package does module a.py ultimately import?
{"action":"REDIRECT_STRATEGY","rationale":"The open task is investigative (trace the import chain from a.py to its ultimate third-party package), but the only strategy tried is DIRECT_EDIT, which is a poor fit and has hit the same injected tool failure 3 times. Switching to a search-based approach with alternate tools avoids the failing path and directly answers the question.","strategy_hint":"BROADER_SEARCH","plan_note":null,"investigation":null,"question":null}No natural-language reply — the run ended on a harness directive or an unrecovered stall. See the full harness trace below.
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| hypothesis | — | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → output_validation (2)
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| hypothesis | — | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "BROADER_SEARCH" (LOCAL replan) |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| supervisor | acted | REDIRECT_STRATEGY: The open task is investigative (trace the import chain from a.py to its ultimate third-party package), but the only strategy tried is DIRECT_EDIT, which is a poor fit and has hit th |
action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → output_validation (2)