Model: Claude Haiku 4.5 (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
flagOn = PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposer
What is the API_KEY placeholder value in the example env file?
What is the API_KEY placeholder value in the example env file?
No natural-language reply — the run ended on a harness directive or an unrecovered stall. See the full harness trace below.
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "your-key-here" | fail |
| not contains "no example file" | pass |
| not contains "cannot find" | pass |
| not contains "not present" | pass |
| not contains "there is no .env" | pass |
success no · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered no
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| hypothesis | — | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → output_validation (2)